What is NCARB's stance on consequential damages arising from the use of materials?

NCARB's position clearly states that it is not liable for consequential damages. This means that if there are any indirect damages or losses that result from the use of materials—such as lost profits, additional construction costs, or impacts on project timelines—NCARB does not assume financial responsibility for these outcomes.

In the context of professional services and the contracts associated with them, the delineation of liability is crucial. Architects and firms often seek to limit their liability due to the unpredictable nature of indirect damages, which can significantly exceed direct costs associated with a project. By establishing this stance, NCARB encourages practitioners to take steps to mitigate risks related to material selection and use and helps clarify the responsibilities and expectations for both architects and clients in the profession.

Other options suggest various degrees of liability or mention of damages, which do not align with NCARB's established guidelines regarding liability limits. This clarity helps ensure that architects can operate within a framework that encourages professional judgment and responsibility while protecting them from undue risk.